Share this content on Facebook!
02 Aug 2016
The Baptism Together with the Holy Spirit - A Regeneration and Sanctification Perspective

The Baptism using the Holy Spirit is an extremely controversial subject inside Christian community. Although Christians of denominations trust a soteriology including a baptism with the Holy Spirit, theologically, all tend not to agree for the some time to way a believer is baptized with all the Holy Spirit.

sacrament of baptism

It is our thought that the Holy Spirit baptism is promised to each and every believer regenerated by faith in Christ. However, only a few believer is baptized using the Holy Spirit during conversion.

Even as check out the New Testament record found in the book of Acts, we shall discover, no doub it is very easy to be changed to Christ and regenerated with the Spirit, yet somehow not receive the experience referred to as the Baptism with the Holy Spirit until some time afterward.

Why isn't We Read the Book of Acts?

The novel of Acts is the only history book inside the New Testament. Unlike the epistles, that are letters written to churches or people to instruct believers in the faith; in Acts, Luke records with great detail the historical setting and chronology in the first century church because it unfolds, from the moment before the morning of Pentecost 33 AD along with the years rigtht after.

Whilst the epistles are written to prospects that had already received the experience of the baptism using the Holy Spirit, the ebook of Acts alone provides historical record of how many of the churches and folks exactly who the epistles were written were saved and subsequently received the ability called the baptism with all the Holy Spirit.

Without studying the book of Acts, one cannot understand or comprehend the distinction between being born again in the Spirit and being baptized with all the Spirit. The theological contribution of each historical account of early believers using the Holy Spirit is recorded by using these detail as to give you a consistent biblical theology regarding New Testament accounts of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit.

Although a few preachers be put off by the Holy Spirit phenomenon witnessed in Acts, or make an effort to explain away the implications from the truths presented there, to disregard or perhaps ignore this authentic historical record is to be negligent of rightly dividing the word of truth.

I believe that this failure of numerous bible teachers to truthfully and accurately portray the biblical record inside the book of Acts would be the sole reason a substantial segment in the body of Christ is short of the strength of God and in knowing the workings of His Spirit.

During the entire most this writing we shall try and address these:

1) What is the baptism together with the Holy Spirit?
2) May be the baptism together with the Holy Spirit subsequent to salvation or concurrent with salvation?
3) Is there is often a contrast between being baptized by the Spirit and being baptized with the Spirit?
4) What's the difference between getting the gift with the Holy Spirit talking to other tongues and obtaining the gift of tongues?
5) Will there be can be a among the objective of speaking in other tongues like a sign as well as the function of the spiritual gift of divers (diverse) kinds of tongues?

There are some who support the view, to get born with the Spirit and be baptized with all the Spirit are essentially one and also the selfsame experience. Others support the view, to be born again in the Spirit is indeed not the same as the baptism using the Spirit, but both always occur simultaneously. However, does the Acts' record support these positions?

Our study reveals, the Acts record shows that some believers did have the Baptism with the Holy Spirit following conversion and then any public confession of religion in Christ, while others received the baptism with all the Spirit just before any public confession of faith in Christ.

As we examine the Acts record, we shall soon discover that:

The Baptism using the Holy Spirit is actually not the same as the Birth from the Spirit. Once we examine both experiences closely we find the next really was:

1) The birth with the Spirit is definitely an act of regeneration and the re-birth in the believer into Christ in salvation.
2) The baptism using the Spirit can be an act of sanctification along with the setting apart of the believer for service.

What makes this distinction important?

In regeneration, every believer is baptized from the Spirit into (gk. eis) Christ.
In sanctification, every believer is baptized by Christ into (eis) the Holy Spirit.

Into One Body, Into One Spirit

The following scriptural references can have there are two distinct operations with the Godhead intended for being born-again of the Spirit and subsequently being baptized with all the Spirit.

"For by one Spirit shall we be all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all built to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13) KJV.

"And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven just like a dove, plus it abode upon him. And i also knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the identical said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt begin to see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, precisely the same is he which baptizeth with all the Holy Ghost" (Jn. 1:32-33) KJV.

The phrase by in 1 Cor. 12:13 describes the regenerative agency of the baby with the Holy Spirit, as the word with in Jn. 1:33 describes the sanctifying agency of the baby of Christ. Even though the Greek word en is translated within the Bible as by, with, in, via, while these scriptures there is no mistaking the reality that:

Two separate persons from the Godhead get excited about the operation (gk. energia) to be born with the Spirit along with the entire process of being baptized together with the Spirit.

Notice carefully, a single operation (regeneration) the Holy Spirit is the baptizer into Jesus Christ. Inside the other operation (sanctification), Jesus Christ could be the baptizer with and into the Holy Spirit.

1) In regeneration > the Holy Spirit > is the baptizer > into Jesus Christ
2) In sanctification > Christ > may be the baptizer > into the Holy Spirit

One might naturally ask, how is the believer baptized both with and in the Holy Spirit at the same time?

The term baptize means to immerse, dip, or plunge. Accordingly, when a believer is baptized with all the Holy Spirit he/she is baptized both with the Spirit and immersed to the Spirit, just as a believer is baptized both with water and immersed into water.

The commitment of the Father to give another comforter was fulfilled at the time of Pentecost A.D. 33 as he did start to pour beyond His Spirit upon all flesh. The dad works as much as possible from the finished work of His Son, Christ, from the Holy Spirit.

Jesus said that the Holy Spirit had not been yet given while he has not been yet glorified. Which means that the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus (the finished work of Christ) were required to occur prior to Holy Spirit could possibly be given to men. Before the day's Pentecost the disciples received what is known the breath of promise (Jn. 20:22).

The Baptism of Regeneration

The baptism with the Spirit into Christ is also called the baptism of regeneration. It is the same experience spoken of by Paul in Titus 3:5 since the washing of regeneration.

We have to be mindful here, because even though the word washing is utilized on this verse; notice, the words water or water baptism just isn't. Consequently, this verse is just not inferring baptismal regeneration by water as some incorrectly teach. This verse does, however, teach baptismal regeneration through the Spirit.

The term washing (gk: loutron) in Titus 3:5 has nothing regarding water baptism, except in a figurative sense. Because, baptism with water illustrates exactly what the Spirit has accomplished in regeneration. Thus, Paul concludes that this washing of regeneration as well as the renewing of the believer is from the Holy Spirit.

To conclude, the new-birth by the Spirit regenerates the believer and places the believer in to the Body of Christ. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit subsequently sanctifies the believer and is an endowment of power (gk. dunamis) equipping the believer for service in order to match the great commission.

There is certainly One Baptism using the Holy Spirit

In Ephesians 4:5 Paul writes that there's one Lord, one faith, then one baptism. Precisely what does this imply?

It's uncertain whether this verse describes water baptism or Sprit baptism; the context doesn't say. Even though the Greek word used here's baptisma in fact it is utilized in the brand new Testament with water baptism, the Greek word for baptize is used to both water baptism and the baptism using the Holy Spirit.

When it concerns the Spirit, there is certainly just one baptism with the Spirit. However, there are many re-fillings from the Spirit. So, when Paul writes, be not drunk with wine, but be filled with the Spirit, it is really an imperative to all believers to reside in continually within the power and influence of the Holy Spirit rather than under the influence of alcohol.

Although a believer might be baptized using the Holy Spirit only once, the believer may continually drink into one Spirit and become filled and re-filled more often than not during the entire believer's lifetime.

Have you ever received the Holy Ghost when you believed?

Is every believer presumed being baptized with the Holy Spirit immediately upon believing in Christ? Some teach this, however:

In Acts chapter 19 it has an occasion where Paul found certain former disciples of John the Baptist and asked them a remarkable question: Have you ever received the Holy Ghost since ye believed?

Now, if every believer is automatically presumed being baptized together with the Holy Spirit upon faith, conversion, and regeneration, then Paul's question to the telltale disciples makes no sense at all.

Sizzling hot Paul's question is practical is that if there was clearly an expectation of your pending subsequent experience with the Holy Spirit after faith, conversion, and regeneration by the Spirit.

This the fact is also born out in another interesting account seen in Acts chapter 8 the location where the Samaritans stumbled on faith in Christ, were even baptized in water, but didn't receive the Baptism with the Holy Spirit prior to the apostles, Peter and John came and laid their hands upon them.

Both of these accounts yet others in Acts, prove that there's a baptism with the Holy Spirit that is a separate and distinct experience from your birth in the Spirit.

These Signs Shall Follow Them That Believe

There's an important and necessary correlation between faith as well as any operation in the Spirit; whether it's related to salvation, healing, miracles, etc. This runs specifically true in the baptism using the Holy Spirit.

Many believers can believe in Christ for salvation, but cannot rely on him for other pursuits for example divine healing or even in this case the baptism with all the Spirit.

A lot of because of this. Insufficient proper teaching and understanding in this field brings about deficiency of faith. Deficiencies in faith and unbelief will prevent a saved person from getting the Holy Spirit baptism.

Were told more than once in scripture that faith in Christ is really a prerequisite for receiving the baptism together with the Holy Spirit. Jesus said, He that believeth on me, since the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of life water.

There's two Greek words found in scripture to indicate the distinction between getting the gift of the Holy Spirit (evidenced by addressing other tongues) and also the spiritual gift of tongues. They are: dorea and charisma.

It is really an important distinction because, one much first obtain the gift (dorea) in the Holy Spirit before you can purchase an individual gift (charisma) or gifts from the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit baptism with all the sign or proof addressing other tongues must not to get wrongly identified as the present of tongues used in prayer, praise, and prophecy.

Just a little known facts are, the word dorea (gift) is definitely used in scripture to differentiate the present from the Holy Spirit evidenced by talking to other tongues, even though the word charisma (gift) is always used of the gift of tongues.

Whenever speaking with other tongues is known in Acts associated with the baptism with the Holy Spirit the phrase dorea is usually used. However, whenever speaking in tongues is used elsewhere inside the New Testament, the term charisma is employed to denote the spiritual gift.

So, when Paul asks the question, do all speak with tongues; he or she is speaking about the spiritual gift (charisma) and never on the gift (dorea) in the Holy Spirit with the manifestation of talking to other tongues.

It's been my experience to look at that the believer may in reality talk to other tongues before their baptism with the Holy Spirit, but might not ever subsequently receive or operate in the gift of tongues whatsoever.

The charisma gift of tongues is described in scripture as divers kinds (gk. genos) of tongues and diversities (genos) of tongues. It is because there are essentially two distinct classifications or kinds (genos) of the gift of tongues. You'll find devotional and prophetic tongues and each has another function and purpose.

Devotional tongues really are a prayer and praise language - its function is, man speaking to God, and its particular purpose is always to edify the person believer. Prophetic tongues can be a language of prophecy - its function is, God talking with man. When coupled with the gift of interpretation of tongues its purpose is to edify the entire church.

It really is prophesying in tongues (when God speaks to man) that will require interpretation. However, prayer offered in tongues (when man talks to God) doesn't require an interpretation, since speaker is actually praying to God rather than speaking with man, God does not have an interpreter.

The difference being, praying in tongues edifies the one doing the praying, while prophesying in tongues edifies the entire church. For that reason prophecy in tongues have to be interpreted.

In the baptism using the Spirit, a believer may talk to sometimes a devotional or prophetic language that is unknown to the speaker. This can be indicative to all present but especially those who believe not.

It's taught that runners who believe not refer to unsaved people. However, this can be only partially correct. Those who believe not, could also reference anyone (saved or otherwise not) that is unlearned and does not rely on the power of God to cast out devils, talk to new tongues, heal the sick, etc,.

When Jesus said, these signs shall follow them that believe, he was also insisting that supernatural manifestations of the power God (signs) would follow individuals who have faith. However, when they do not have faith these signs won't follow them.

Probably, no account in Acts is a bit more revealing than chapter 8 pertaining to the baptism together with the Holy Spirit being an experience separate and dissimilar to regeneration.

In Acts 8 Phillip the Evangelist preaches the gospel to Samaria where lots of believe and they are baptized. However, it is expressly described that it hadn't been before apostles Peter and John found town and laid their face to face them that they can received the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

The issue remains, if there wasn't any evidence of this experience, then how did Simon the sorcerer yet others have in mind the Holy Spirit had fallen about the believers in Samaria? Because, he like the others beheld the twelve signs which were done.

And let us take into account family members of Cornelius the initial Gentile converts to Christ, who received the baptism together with the Holy Spirit talking to tongues while Peter yet preached Christ unto them.

The only real sign that accompanied the baptism with all the Holy Ghost in the bible was those of speaking with other tongues since the Spirit gave utterance.

Some bible teachers have experimented with explain away the phenomenon of saved believers who did not have the baptism with the Holy Spirit until sometime later. They teach for the Jews, Samaritans, and Gentile nations (being a people group) for the original in-filling of the Holy Spirit an apostle must be given to certify them.

Furthermore, some teach, once each people group received the Holy Spirit baptism through the laying on of hands of your apostle, there was no longer an expectation of getting the baptism using the Holy Spirit together with the manifestation of speaking in tongues. Interestingly, the bible will not support this theory, and yes it depends upon only speculation.

Finally, our last demonstration of a saved parent receiving the baptism with the Holy Ghost subsequent to salvation and conversion is the apostle Paul himself. Whom, having had hands laid on him by Ananias (who was no apostle) received his sight and was concurrently baptized and stuffed with the Holy Spirit.

Whenever the book of Acts offers an account where believers initially get the Holy Spirit, it might be regarded as the baptism or the in-filling using the Holy Spirit. However, remember, there is only one baptism with all the Holy Spirit but a majority of re-fillings.

What's the contrast between a Pentecostal as well as a Charismatic?

You will find there's contrast between a Pentecostal plus a Charismatic. Pentecostals hold on the teaching how the baptism with the Holy Ghost is obviously with the evidence (or sign) of talking to other tongues.

Charismatics, however, are believers who may have received the baptism with the Holy Spirit evidenced by talking to other tongues, when they were people in other denominations or groups apart from classical Pentecostal groups.

In addition, unlike Pentecostals, Charismatics consult with tongues and be employed in other spiritual gifts, but do not necessarily hold the baptism with the Spirit is always evidenced by speaking with other tongues. Some Charismatics hold how the baptism together with the Spirit could be evidenced by other gifts with the Spirit including healing, prophecy, etc.

To conclude, it's impossible to develop a frequent and biblical theology of the experience known as the baptism with all the Holy Spirit without examining the accounts referenced within the book of Acts.

We affirm there's a distinct Christian experience of the Bible termed as the baptism together with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit baptism is surely an endowment of capability to equip the believer to witness for Christ and to perform great commission.

The Holy Spirit Baptism is after salvation and might occur as well as salvation. However, being baptized together with the Spirit in sanctification is often a distinct work of the Godhead apart from being baptized from the Spirit in regeneration.

There is also a distinction obtaining the gift (dorea) with the Holy Ghost and obtaining the gift (charisma) of tongues. And although speaking in tongues can serve a dual function and purpose (devotional or prophetic) simultaneously, you will find there's contrast between the part and purpose of speaking in other tongues as being a sign and the spiritual gift of diverse kinds (genos) of tongues.

sacrament of baptism


There isn't any comment in this page yet!

Do you want to be the first commenter?

New Comment

Full Name:
E-Mail Address:
Your website (if exists):
Your Comment:
Security code: